B.

I wish they were A, but I feel sure they are B.

I'm sure they're B, but I don't get it. Why not just buy a real jump rope from the dollar store?

They've got to be the jump rope thingys - what a waste of money!

What a shameless way to get comments! I love it! I'm going to have to go with D.

It's B, and the theory is that if you don't have an actual rope, you can't mess up. And jumping rope is hard! If these get someone to start moving, then great. But for most, I'm guessing they only cause money loss, and not weight loss.

I'm guessing "B" as well.

I agree that B makes most sense.

I'm just saying C - cause its funny :)

Looks like the jump ropes...kinda lame.

You guys nailed it. Not only is that a picture of ropeless jump rope, but it costs a whopping 60 smackers!

I would sit on my couch and twirl the damn thing like I actually did a work out.

Those definitely look like Super Fun! Sex Toys.

okay, how is C not the same thing as a vibrator? apparently I'm slow on the uptake. That said, I really wish it was C, or something other than what it is. because really, $60 for a jump rope?

Granted, the $60 price tag is a little high - but, for people who are as klutzy as I am (think tripping over an actual jump rope), it's not a bad idea.

I am pretty klutzy too--in fact, if I was waving around a pair of handles with what appear to be weights on a string attached to them, sooner or later I'd accidently fire one of them through a plate glass window or a TV screen. I do love jumping rope, though...

If it's to pretend to jump rope without actually running the risk of tripping on the rope, you can do that without anything at all in your hands. It'd look weird, but at least it wouldn't cost 60 bucks. *rolleyes*

(To be honest, when I saw the picture, I would've gone with sex toys. At least it looked like it could produce, uhm, creative output.)

If these things had actually been sex toys, then $60 would have been a bargain.

I'll wait for the digital Chinese jumpropes to come out.